Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free
Research Abstract

Blood-cell velocity in the nailfold capillaries of patients with normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.

Gasser P, Flammer J
American journal of ophthalmology
May 15, 1991
Sources
1 min read
0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

2 views
Share:

Abstract

We compared the capillary blood-cell velocity in the fingertips of 30 patients with high-tension glaucoma, 30 patients with normal-tension glaucoma, and 30 control subjects by nailfold capillaroscopy. There were no measurable differences in the morphologic findings. The blood-flow velocity, however, was reduced significantly in the patients with normal-tension glaucoma compared with the control subjects (P less than .05). This difference was especially pronounced after cold provocation (P less than .0005). After cooling, 25 of 30 patients with normal-tension glaucoma had a blood standstill of 12 seconds or more, whereas only three of 30 control subjects and four of 30 patients with high-tension glaucoma had a measurable blood standstill.

Affiliation

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland.

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.