Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free
Research Abstract

Comparison of commercial pyrogen testing laboratories.

Bobinet DD, Williams CC, Cohen MB
American journal of hospital pharmacy
Aug 1, 1976
Sources
1 min read
0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

1 view
Share:

Abstract

The pyrogen test results of four laboratories were compared to determine if any inconsistencies existed. Samples submitted for pyrogen testing were of two types: (1) radiopharmaceuticals which had been allowed to decay to negligible activity or mock radiopharmaceuticals prepared with saline instead of pertechnetate, and (2) positive controls of bacterial endotoxin. The drugs used in the eight-rabbit tests included 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin, 99mTc-human serum albumin, 99mTc-sulfur colloid, saline and iodinated fibrinogen. Laboratory A showed a 52% failure rate for the testing of 36 preparations. Samples identical to those not passed by laboratory A were passed by laboratories B, C and D. It is recommended that all users of pyrogen testing laboratories periodically submit samples of known apyrogenicity for testing.

External References

PubMed ID:
949064

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.