Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free
Research Abstract Human Study

Estimated vitamin D production from natural sun exposure.

Estimated equivalency of vitamin D production from natural sun exposure versus oral vitamin D supplementation across seasons at two US latitudes.

0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

329 views
Share:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between oral vitamin D supplementation and cutaneous photosynthesis is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to provide estimates of the equivalency of vitamin D production from natural sun exposure versus oral supplementation. METHODS: Using the FastRT simulation tool, we determined sun exposure times needed to achieve serum vitamin D(3) concentrations equivalent to 400 or 1000 IU vitamin D for individuals of various Fitzpatrick skin types living in Miami, FL, and Boston, MA, during the months of January, April, July, and October. RESULTS: Peak ultraviolet B irradiation for vitamin D synthesis occurs around 12 pm Eastern Standard Time (EST). In Boston, MA, from April to October at 12 pm EST an individual with type III skin, with 25.5% of the body surface area exposed, would need to spend 3 to 8 minutes in the sun to synthesize 400 IU of vitamin D. It is difficult to synthesize vitamin D during the winter in Boston, MA. For all study months in Miami, FL, an individual with type III skin would need to spend 3 to 6 minutes at 12 pm EST to synthesize 400 IU. Vitamin D synthesis occurs faster in individuals with lighter Fitzpatrick skin types. The duration to attain 1000 IU of vitamin D is longer in all scenarios. LIMITATIONS: Results of the computer model are only approximations. In addition, calculations were made based on the assumption that (1/4) of 1 minimal erythema dose directed at (1/4) body surface area is equal to 1000 IU of oral vitamin D. CONCLUSIONS: Although it may be tempting to recommend intentional sun exposure based on our findings, it is difficult, if not impossible to titrate one's exposure. There are well-known detrimental side effects of ultraviolet irradiation. Therefore, oral supplementation remains the safest way for increasing vitamin D status.

Affiliation

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10022, USA.

External References

PubMed ID:
20363523

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

More Research Abstracts

View All Abstracts
Review

Vitamin D in reproductive health disorders: A narrative review focusing on infertility, endometriosis, and polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Mar 3, 2025 Ximena A van Tienhoven, Jimena Ruiz de Chávez Gascón, Gabriela Cano-Herrera, JoséAntonio Sarkis Nehme, Ariela A Souroujon Torun, Maria Fernanda Bautista Gonzalez, Felipe Esparza Salazar, Ana Sierra Brozon, Eder Gabriel Rivera Rosas, Dante Carbajal Ocampo, Ramiro Cabrera Carranco

Int J Mol Sci

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.