Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free
Research Abstract

Intralaboratory reproducibility in cervical cytology. Results of the application of a 100-slide set.

Confortini M, Biggeri A, Cariaggi MP, Carozzi FM, Minuti PA, Russo A, Palli D
Acta cytologica
Jan 1, 1993
Sources
1 min read
0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

1 view
Share:

Abstract

In order to evaluate the agreement and accuracy of cervical (vaginal) cytologic diagnoses, 16 cytologists from a large laboratory in Florence, Italy, with experience ranging from 2 to 25 years, independently examined a set of 100 slides. A common reporting form based on a seven-category classification system was used. Concordance was calculated for each pairwise comparison between the 16 cytologists and between each cytologist and the target diagnosis. The values of the kappa statistic for the whole laboratory were .49 for the multiple raters comparison and .59 for the target diagnosis comparison, showing a relatively good degree of agreement.

Affiliation

Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica, Firenze, Italy.

External References

PubMed ID:
8434496

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

More Research Abstracts

View All Abstracts

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.