Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free
Research Abstract Human Study

Invasive breast cancer incidence is 57% higher in women undergoing mammography screening, indicating the possibility that left undiagnosed and untreated some invasive breast cancers spontaneously regress (or, that mammography causes invasive cancer)

The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.

Arch Intern Med
Nov 24, 2008
Sources
0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

1,148 views
Share:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of screening mammography has been associated with sustained increases in breast cancer incidence. The natural history of these screen-detected cancers is not well understood. METHODS: We compared cumulative breast cancer incidence in age-matched cohorts of women residing in 4 Norwegian counties before and after the initiation of biennial mammography. The screened group included all women who were invited for all 3 rounds of screening during the period 1996 through 2001 (age range in 1996, 50-64 years). The control group included all women who would have been invited for screening had there been a screening program during the period 1992 through 1997 (age range in 1992, 50-64 years). All women in the control group were invited to undergo a 1-time prevalence screen at the end of their observation period. Screening attendance was similar in both groups (screened, 78.3%, and controls, 79.5%). Counts of incident invasive breast cancers were obtained from the Norwegian Cancer Registry (in situ cancers were excluded). RESULTS: As expected, before the age-matched controls were invited to be screened at the end of their observation period, the cumulative incidence of invasive breast cancer was significantly higher in the screened group than in the controls (4-year cumulative incidence: 1268 vs 810 per 100 000 population; relative rate, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-1.70). Even after prevalence screening in controls, however, the cumulative incidence of invasive breast cancer remained 22% higher in the screened group (6-year cumulative incidence: 1909 vs 1564 per 100 000 population; relative rate, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.30). Higher incidence was observed in screened women at each year of age. CONCLUSIONS: Because the cumulative incidence among controls never reached that of the screened group, it appears that some breast cancers detected by repeated mammographic screening would not persist to be detectable by a single mammogram at the end of 6 years. This raises the possibility that the natural course of some screen-detected invasive breast cancers is to spontaneously regress.

Affiliation

VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT 05009, USA.

External References

PubMed ID:
19029493

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

More Research Abstracts

View All Abstracts
Animal Study

Melatonin has shown to be effective in controlling metastatic breast cancer in vitro and in vivo.

Aug 20, 2015 Thaiz Ferraz Borin, Ali Syed Arbab, Gabriela Bottaro Gelaleti, Lívia Carvalho Ferreira, Marina Gobbe Moschetta, Bruna Victorasso Jardim-Perassi, Asm Iskander, Nadimpalli Ravi S Varma, Adarsh Shankar, Verena Benedick Coimbra, Vanessa Alves Fabri, Juliana Garcia de Oliveira, Debora Aparecida Pires de Campos Zuccari

J Pineal Res

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.