Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free
Research Abstract

Investigation of myocardial extracellular volume fraction in heart failure patients using iodine map with rapid-kV switching dual-energy CT: Segmental comparison with MRI T1 mapping.

Ohta Y, Kishimoto J, Kitao S, Yunaga H, Mukai-Yatagai N, Fujii S, Yamamoto K, Fukuda T, Ogawa T
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
Jan 1, 2020
Sources
2 min read
0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

1 view
Share:

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for each region or segment using iodine density image (IDI) with single-source dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and compare the results with an MRI T1 mapping approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this prospective study, 79 consecutive heart failure patients referred for MRI were included and 23 patients (14 men, 63 ± 14 years) who underwent both MRI and late contrast enhancement DECT following coronary CT angiography were evaluated. CT-ECV was computed from IDI using late acquisition projection data. MR-ECV was computed from native and post-contrast T1 maps using non-rigid image registration for segments with evaluable image quality from 3.0-T MRI. Regional CT-ECV and MR-ECV were measured based on 16-segment models. CT-ECV and MR-ECV were compared using Pearson correlations. Agreement among methods was assessed using Bland-Altman comparisons. RESULTS: In the 368 segments, although all segments were evaluable on IDI, 37 segments were rated as non-evaluable on T1 maps. Overall, 331 segments were analyzed. Mean CT-ECV and MR-ECV were 31.6 ± 9.1 and 33.2 ± 9.1, respectively. Strong correlations were seen between CT-ECV and MR-ECV for each region, as follows: all segments, r = 0.837; septal, r = 0.871; mid-septal, r = 0.895; anterior, r = 0.869; inferior, r = 0.793; and lateral, 0.864 (all p < 0.001). Differences between CT-ECV and MR-ECV were as follows: all segments, 1.13 ± 4.98; septal, -1.51 ± 4.37; mid-septal, -1.85 ± 4.22; anterior, 2.54 ± 4.89; inferior, 1.2 ± 5.78; and lateral, 2.65 ± 3.98. CONCLUSION: ECV using DECT and from cardiac MRI showed a strong correlation on regional and segmental evaluations. DECT is useful for characterizing myocardial ECV changes as well as MRI.

Affiliation

Division of Radiology, Department of Pathophysiological Therapeutic Science, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago City, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan; National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita City, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan. Electronic address: [email protected].

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.