Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free
Research Abstract Human Study

In T2D patients treated with diet and metformin, two days of iso-energetic replacement of dietary carbohydrates by protein and fat reduced all indices of glycaemic variability by 36%-45%.

The clinical effects of a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein diet on glycaemic variability in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomised controlled study.

0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

76 views
Share:

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: High glycaemic variability (GV) is associated with late complications in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We hypothesised that a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein (CRHP) diet would reduce GV acutely in patients with T2D compared with a conventional diabetes (CD) diet. METHODS: In this controlled, randomised crossover study, 16 patients with metformin-treated T2D (median (IQR) age: 64.0 (58.8-68.0) years; HbA: 47 (43-57) mmol/mol; duration of T2D: 5.5 (2.8-10.3) years) were assigned to an energy-matched CRHP diet and CD diet (31E%/54E% carbohydrate, 29E%/16E% protein and 40E%/30E% fat, respectively) for two separate 48-h intervention periods. Interstitial continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed to assess accepted measures of glycaemic variability, i.e. standard deviation (SD) around the sensor glucose level; coefficient of variation in percent (CV); mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE); continuous overlapping net glycaemic action (CONGA, CONGA) of observations 1 and 4 h apart; and mean absolute glucose (MAG) change. RESULTS: All indices of glycaemic variability (mean ± SD) were significantly reduced during CRHP diet compared with CD diet; including SD (1.0 ± 0.3 (CRHP) vs 1.6 ± 0.5 mmol/L (CD)), CV (12.3 ± 3.8 vs 19.3 ± 5.5%), MAGE (2.3 ± 0.9 vs 4.2 ± 1.3 mmol/L), CONGA(0.8 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.4 mmol/L), CONGA(1.4 ± 0.5 vs 2.5 ± 0.8 mmol/L), and MAG change (0.9 ± 0.3 vs 1.4 ± 0.4 mmol/L/h) (p 

Affiliation

Mads N Thomsen

External References

PubMed ID:
32859328

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

More Research Abstracts

View All Abstracts

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.