Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free
Research Abstract

[The value of ossovenography in advanced female genital carcinoma. A contribution to diagnosis of combined obstructive edema (author's transl)].

Vahrson H
Rontgen-Blatter; Zeitschrift fur Rontgen-Technik und medizinisch-wissenschaftliche Photographie
Jul 1, 1976
Sources
1 min read
0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

1 view
Share:

Abstract

The pertrochanteric ossovenography brought important results on the etiology of combined obstructive edema of the lower limb after genital carcinoma. Its advantage in comparison with other methods of phlebography is the lack of embolic danger for the patient, its suitability even in thrombosis of the V. femoralis and the optimal contrast staining of venous system and anastomoses. The combined obstructive edema is characterized by a block of pelvic veins and a complete or incomplete block of lymph vessels. The combined obstructive edema depends only on the venous block as is demonstrated. A report on therapy and prognosis of 30 cases is given.

External References

PubMed ID:
968379

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

More Research Abstracts

View All Abstracts

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.