Visit our Re-post guidelines
It's illegal for children to vote. It's illegal for children to choose to drink alcohol. It's illegal for children to drive. It's illegal for children to give consent for medical procedures. Yet, New York is planning to let children give consent for vaccinations, a potentially life-changing or destroying procedure, without parental consent? [Gaia Health]
by Christina England
On Monday, May 6, a new bill is to be brought to the New York State Assembly floor which will allow licensed physicians to administer preventative medical care for sexually transmitted diseases, including vaccines to minors without their parent's permission.
This will include the vaccinations for hepatitis B and HPV.
The reasoning behind the bill is that section 2305 of the public health law currently permits a licensed physician or a staff physician to diagnose and treat a person under the age of 21 infected or exposed to a sexually transmissible disease without the consent or knowledge of the parents or guardians.
The bill states that the current law does not allow young people the same access to care as adults to prevent sexually transmissible diseases.
The Bill States
Teens should not be limited to access to care on a confidential basis after the fact, or after infection or contraction of a sexually transmissible disease. Teens should have access to confidential care before infection or contracting the sexually transmissible disease, to prevent disease or life-threatening illness such as cervical cancer and liver cancer.[1]
When a bill of this nature becomes law, minors can be vaccinated without their parent's permission, and vaccines for sexually transmitted diseases could also be able to be given to newborns without parental consent.
Don't Let Your Child Be the Next Victim
The GreenMedInfo website has listed a total of 60 papers detailing the potential dangers of the Hep B vaccination.[2]
However, if readers feel that researching all these papers is just a little overwhelming, then one of the strongest reminders of just how this vaccination can affect a newborn can be found on the Age of Autism website.[3]
In 2009, the Age of Autism highlighted the tragic story of Ian.
Ian was born a completely healthy baby boy, although he did have one complication when he swallowed some of the meconium (stool) during delivery. After receiving treatment for breathing difficulties, it was not long before doctors stated that he was well enough to be discharged.
Despite the fact that Ian had a fever and was still fighting the side effects of swallowing meconium, Ian's parents were asked to sign a form to allow them to administer the Hep B vaccination before their baby was released.
His mother takes up the story for the Age of Autism:
After receiving the Hepatitis B shot these symptoms also appeared:
- Platelets dropped from 248,000 to 131,000 – severe thrombocytopenia
- Scalded-like rash appeared
- Seizures noted
- Irritable, crying non-stop
- Stopped eating
- Viral-like symptoms
His pictures speak a million words. Within 12 hours of his vaccination he had the rash, within 24 hours the severe thrombocytopenia set in, and then he was in a fatal state from then on. NO DOCTORS, NURSES, STAFF would even consider the vaccination as the source.
Ian lived for 47 days. My son suffered nearly his entire life. Look at the pictures. Imagine watching your child going through this pain and not being able to do anything. No one would listen to us.... we are just parents, what do we know? We didn't leave his side for one moment. We lived at the hospital, literally. I couldn't save my first born son, I couldn't make the 'ouchie' better. I sat there day in and day out and watched this vaccination destroy his organ one at a time.
The photos of baby Ian are probably the most horrific photos I have ever seen. They are stark reminder of just how dangerous this vaccination can be, a vaccination that the USA government, wants to administer to a minor without parental consent.
The Facts About This Dangerous Vaccination
Reports of adverse reactions show that as of mid-2012, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received 119 reports of death following HPV vaccination, as well as:
- 894 reports of disability
- 517 life-threatening adverse events
- 9,889 emergency room visits
- 2,781 hospitalizations[4]
According to Diane Harper, an international expert in HPV science, its vaccines, its clinical disease and treatment and the leading professional involved in the clinical trials of the HPV vaccinations, the duration for the effectiveness of the HPV vaccination Gardasil is just five years. In an interview with Marcia G. Yerman she states:
If the vaccinated person is not sexually active during the five years of its efficacy, then the vaccine has not protected her from disease (as we do not have evidence that Gardasil offers efficacy any longer than five years). Its faults include tiny antibody titers for all HPV types other than HPV 16; limited protection; limited duration of efficacy; and safety concerns (as outlined in my opening statement).
If this is correct, a child vaccinated at age eleven will not be protected on any level unless she becomes sexually active before the age of sixteen. Quite shocking, isn't it?
One of the most damning facts that Ms. Harper revealed in her interview was when Ms. Yerman asked her this question:
Do you believe that the Gardasil vaccine, as it currently stands, could present more risks to a young girl or woman than the possibility of cervical cancer?
Ms. Harper answered:
Pap smears have never killed anyone. Pap smears are an effective screening tool to prevent cervical cancer. Pap smears alone prevent more cervical cancers than can the vaccines alone.
Gardasil is associated with serious adverse events, including death. If Gardasil is given to 11 year olds, and the vaccine does not last at least fifteen years, then there is no benefit – and only risk – for the young girl. Vaccinating will not reduce the population incidence of cervical cancer if the woman continues to get Pap screening throughout her life.
If a woman is never going to get Pap screening, then a HPV vaccine could offer her a better chance of not developing cervical cancer, and this protection may be valued by the woman as worth the small but real risks of serious adverse events.
On the other hand, the woman may not value the protection from Gardasil as being worth the risk knowing that 1) she is at low risk for a persistent HPV infection and 2) most precancers can be detected and treated successfully. It is entirely a personal value judgment. [5]
I have also interviewed Ms. Harper and I also received similar answers.
How You Can Protect Your Child
Knowing that a leading expert has been prepared to state these facts, are you completely happy to have your rights as a parent taken away from you? If you are not, then the website truthaboutgardasil.com asks you to do the following:
Please contact any member of the New York State Assembly—or better yet, contact any of the bill's sponsors, as seen in the link above to the text of the bill & then find their e-mail addresses—and let them know you oppose this bill! Also, if you are in New York, or are able to get there. A group of people affected by Gardasil will be making the trip to Albany this coming Monday, May 6, 2013 and would love to have more supporters join us! If you can't make it, please send me a picture of the person affected, or even just their name so we can include them in the packet of information that will be handed out.
http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=%0D%0A&bn=A497&term=2013&Summary=Y&Text=Y
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact us. [email protected]
or through Facebook at Marian Hollandsworth Greene [6]
Conclusion
Please act now if you want to have a say in what vaccinations your children receive. These vaccinations are not as safe as the US government wants you to believe they are. If you are still not convinced, please watch the following two videos on the HPV vaccines.
Disqus