BREAKING: 'Kill Musk's Twitter'--Leaked Docs Reveal Transatlantic Plot to Destroy X and Free Speech, Now Involving UK

Views 173

Leaked documents expose a coordinated international campaign, led by British advisors to Kamala Harris and global NGOs, to destroy Musk's X and silence free speech worldwide.

In a shocking continuation of the effort to suppress free speech, newly surfaced details reveal the extent of international collusion in the campaign to deplatform and dismantle Musk's X (formerly Twitter). The revelations now expose the involvement of British political advisors connected to Kamala Harris in a secretive alliance with liberal U.S. officials, global NGOs, and influential media watchdogs.

This disclosure follows last week's groundbreaking report that the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a UK-based organization, was actively strategizing to "Kill Musk's Twitter" by targeting advertisers and leveraging government influence to suppress dissenting voices. The latest findings demonstrate just how vast the network working to silence platforms that support free speech truly is--and the stakes are even higher than initially understood.

A Private Conference, Hidden Agendas

Newly leaked documents have exposed a private conference organized by CCDH, attended by a notable collection of powerful figures and organizations committed to shaping the future of digital discourse. Attendees included officials from the Biden White House, Congressman Adam Schiff's office, the Biden-Harris State Department, and Canadian MP Peter Julian--all of whom are involved in various efforts to censor online speech under the guise of fighting "disinformation."

But perhaps most alarming is the discovery of British political advisors--linked directly to Kamala Harris--who have been pushing the same censorship strategies in the U.S. that they helped implement in the UK. These advisors were instrumental in the development of the UK's Online Safety Bill, a draconian piece of legislation that gives governments the authority to punish online platforms for failing to remove content that challenges official narratives. This bill is a blueprint for global online censorship, and it appears that British influence is now reaching into the U.S. with the goal of implementing similar controls on American platforms, with Musk's X as their prime target.

Global Effort to Criminalize Free Speech

The latest findings fit into a larger international effort to criminalize free speech across borders, as revealed in GreenMedInfo's investigative report, "Breaking: International Governments Are Criminalizing Free Speech Through Global Coordination". According to that report, governments worldwide, especially in regions like Canada, the EU, and Australia, have been coordinating to criminalize dissent by labeling it as "dangerous" or "misinformation." This transatlantic agenda is no longer just an isolated push--it is a coordinated global attempt to silence individuals and organizations that challenge mainstream narratives.

In the case of Musk's X, this global coordination is now targeting one of the last platforms that champions unfettered free speech, with entities from the UK, U.S., and Canada working together to control the narrative. Musk's platform threatens the structure of elite-controlled discourse, and CCDH's collaboration with foreign advisors showcases just how intertwined these government and NGO efforts are to restrict digital freedoms on an international level.

International Forces: British Advisors and U.S. Allies Collude

The names emerging from this conference read like a who's who of censorship advocacy. Among the key players are Sarah Craven, the Director of the United Nations Population Fund for North America, Julie Millican, Vice President of Media Matters for America, and Katie Paul, Director of the Tech Transparency Project. These organizations, along with their foreign and governmental counterparts, are working to implement a framework of digital governance that would make free speech impossible on platforms like X.

Even more significant is the participation of Canadian MP Peter Julian, signaling that these efforts are truly transnational, with governments from both sides of the Atlantic working together to stifle dissent.

The GARM Lawsuit Against Musk's X

The CCDH's agenda and this conference's participants align with the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM)'s actions against Musk's X, as reported in The Independent and The Current. GARM, a coalition of major global corporations, has already discontinued advertising on X, pressuring companies to withdraw support for platforms that allow speech deemed "unsafe" by their standards. GARM's lawsuit against Musk's X highlights how corporate influence is being used to financially cripple platforms that refuse to comply with the narratives set by international elites.

The lawsuit filed by GARM--echoing CCDH's mission--aims to destroy Musk's X economically by cutting off advertising revenue. It's part of a larger strategy to force platforms to adopt more aggressive content moderation policies, especially against what they define as "hate speech" or "misinformation." This is not just about restricting speech, but about using corporate financial power to control the very platforms that have allowed for free expression.

The Broader Campaign to Control the Narrative

The Biden administration's coordination with these groups and foreign actors shows just how deeply enmeshed this censorship agenda has become. As documents from the private conference reveal, the objective isn't just to stop so-called 'disinformation'--it's to fundamentally reshape the internet by shutting down independent platforms like Musk's X, where citizen journalism and alternative viewpoints can thrive without interference from elites.

The conference also saw input from key figures within Media Matters for America, a progressive watchdog organization known for its aggressive campaigns against conservative and independent media outlets. Their influence, combined with the British-led push for censorship, presents a clear and present threat to the future of free speech, especially on platforms like X.

X: The Last Stand for Free Speech

Since Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter, the platform has become the battleground for free expression. Musk's leadership has transformed X into a space where citizen journalism--the Fifth Estate--flourishes, challenging corporate media narratives in real time. This new role as a hub for independent voices is what has made X such a threat to the NGO-government-media complex that seeks to dictate the limits of speech.

GARM and International Corporate Pressure

The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM)'s ongoing pressure campaign against Musk's X represents yet another layer of international influence being leveraged against the platform. As GARM's advertising boycott gains traction, it demonstrates how international coalitions are attempting to squeeze free speech platforms economically. If X cannot generate revenue, it cannot survive as a platform for open dialogue. The lawsuit filed against Musk's X, aimed at forcing policy changes via economic coercion, illustrates how global corporate pressure and NGO influence are intertwined to achieve the same goals of platforms like CCDH--to kill free speech by any means necessary.

The Fight for Free Speech: What's Next?

The revelations from this latest conference show that the battle to kill Musk's Twitter is far from over. With British political advisors, Canadian MPs, and U.S. officials all working in concert with dark money NGOs, the stakes have never been higher for free speech. Platforms like X remain a lifeline for those seeking to challenge the mainstream narrative, but they are also in the crosshairs of powerful forces determined to silence them.

Conclusion  

The revelations keep coming, and the involvement of British advisors connected to Kamala Harris shows just how far the tentacles of this censorship agenda reach. The fight for free speech is now transatlantic, with international actors working together to shape digital policy in ways that suppress dissent and control the narrative.

Musk's X remains the last stronghold for those who value the First Amendment and the right to speak freely, but it is under attack like never before. The question is no longer whether free speech can survive in the digital age--it's whether platforms like X will be allowed to survive at all.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

This website is for information purposes only. By providing the information contained herein we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any type of disease or medical condition. Before beginning any type of natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.

© Copyright 2008-2025 GreenMedInfo.com, Journal Articles copyright of original owners, MeSH copyright NLM.