Skip to main content
You're viewing the free public version. Create a free account for full research and member tools. Join free

Coronavirus Article Response

by GMI reporter
· Published Mar 17, 2020 · 2 min read · Sources
0:00 / 0:00
0:00 / 0:00

Sign in to access this feature

Create a free account or sign in to use AI summaries, listen to articles, download PDFs, and save to your library.

3,059 views
Share:

This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2020

Visit our Re-post guidelines

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Coronavirus Article Response

We are sorry to hear how disappointed you are in our decision to publish David Crowe's article on the problems with coronavirus testing, and greatly appreciate the time you took to communicate how you feel. We would love to explain to you our reasons for publishing his work on our platform. First, we have published a qualification at the beginning of the article: 

"Editor's Note: The views represented here are the opinion of the author, and are not an official endorsement. We believe in publishing a variety of perspectives, focusing on those with well-referenced citations, such as the one below. We encourage our readers to think critically and make informed choices. We hope by providing this information we are contributing to open, meaningful debate, on the crisis that is adversely affecting millions around the world." 

We truly believe that David has identified a growing problem contributing to the fear and panic around this pandemic, namely, that people are being diagnosed as confirmed cases without actual scientific/laboratory confirmation based on standard good practices. This, of course, implies that many are being unnecessarily treated and even harmed with drugs that are extremely toxic. Moreover, for each wrongly identified case, millions more are incited into further fear and instability, and the crisis worsens. This is why, we believe, David Crowe is bringing an important perspective to the topic. That said, we do not endorse his work specifically as identical to our own editorial views, and hope that we can contribute to supporting a diversity of perspectives, sometimes not always congruent, in order to facilitate our readership's ability to make informed choices for themselves. 

Feel free to provide us feedback on what specifically you may disagree with after reading David's well-referenced article, so we can be sure to inform him and correct any scientific inaccuracies. 

Once again, thank you for communicating your concerns which we truly care about. 

Best Regards,

Sayer Ji & The GreenMedInfo Team

Related Databases

GMI reporter

Read More from This Author

Sign in to follow authors

Create a free account or sign in to follow your favorite authors and keep up with their latest work.

Share:

References are included within the article body above.

Comments

Sign in or create a free account to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment

Be the first to comment.

Trusted By Professionals and Teams:

The National Health Federation
Stand For Health Freedom
Global Healing Institute
Global Wellness Forum
MAHA Action
Myers Detox
Natural News
Mercola.com

Unlock Evidence-Based Health Research

Join 500,000+ members accessing 10,000+ natural health topics.

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & Receive

Cancer Fighting Foods Ebook

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.