The World Health Organization's institutional transparency and public perception have been very problematic during the past couple decades
If you actually "follow the science," Wikipedia's description of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s "anti-vaccine advocacy" might elicit indifference or unequivocal support for Wikipedia’s position.
"Medical science has made such tremendous progress that there is hardly a healthy human left." -- Aldous Huxley
The illusion of authoritative knowledge pervades the medical establishment and brainwashes the sleeping media
Today, many of us in the environmental movement consider the greatest danger to human health and the environment is going to be the full roll out of 5G technology
For years, scientists have warned about the dangers of enormous amounts of debris orbiting our planet. Now, telecommunications companies want to 20,000 more satellites to the growing orbit of junk
It is time for Congress to take action and remove immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ("CDA")
According to the World Health Organization, 80% of the world's population uses herbal medicine. Are these hundreds of millions of people simply deluded by superstitious nostrums, as Wikipedia and so-called 'skeptics' claim?
"Chiropractic is a form of alternative medicine mostly concerned with the diagnosis and treatment of mechanical disorders of the musculoskeletal system, especially the spine. Proponents claim that such disorders affect general health via the nervous system, claims which are demonstrably false.... Its foundation is at odds with mainstream medicine, and chiropractic is sustained by pseudoscientific ideas such as subluxation and "innate intelligence" that reject science." -...
Today in the US and a growing number of other countries, the official policy is that any scientific study, regardless of its methodology, quality, author credentials, and peer-reviewed process is summarily dismissed as incomplete, irrelevant or unsupported if it finds a connection between any vaccine or combination of vaccines and autism spectrum disorder.
The flu shot does not discriminate: children, the elderly, and everyone in between can suffer detrimental effects from this dangerous vaccine
What if vaccines have never been soundly confirmed to be safe and effective? What if the CDC, vaccine manufacturers and advocates knew of these discrepancies and contradictions, yet intentionally ignored them against the public interests?
Do you know what's in a vaccine? Will the active, inert and hidden ingredients in a vaccine make you question if you want vaccines in your body?
A recent paper published in the November 2013 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, "Contagious Diseases in the United States from 1988 to the Present," is the first of what will inevitably turn into a flurry of future studies to persuade legislators and the public that vaccination should be mandatory for assuring the health of the nation.
It is that time of year when public health officials, physicians pediatricians and pharmacists warn that everyone over 6 months of age should protect themselves and get vaccinated, but how much of this is based on hard science or propaganda?